Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
Сайт Роскомнадзора атаковали18:00
За период с 17 по 24 февраля инфляция в России ускорилась до 0,19 процента, что более чем в полтора раза выше, чем на предыдущей неделе. Об этом говорится в сообщении на сайте Росстата.，推荐阅读搜狗输入法2026获取更多信息
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
，详情可参考Line官方版本下载
// 核心过滤：弹出栈中「≤当前元素」的数（易错点2：必须是≤，不是<）
While the number of GPs working in the NHS has been increasing over the last year or so, the number of patients per GP is still a fifth higher than it was eight years ago.，更多细节参见搜狗输入法2026